(8:29:26 PM) You have just entered room "Chat 33008756063882467703."
(8:29:31 PM) Abhi327 has entered the room.
Abhi327 (8:29:46 PM): hello vivek
x V DoGG x (8:29:51 PM): hey
x V DoGG x (8:29:52 PM): whats up
x V DoGG x (8:30:29 PM): i was looking at your class diagram
x V DoGG x (8:30:32 PM): very impressive
(8:30:47 PM) starkiller76 has entered the room.
Abhi327 (8:30:52 PM): thanks
Abhi327 (8:31:01 PM): didn't really get time to put it together properly
Abhi327 (8:31:09 PM): but yeah put some thought to it.
Abhi327 (8:31:13 PM): hows chicago ?
Abhi327 (8:31:16 PM): hey dave
Abhi327 (8:31:38 PM): is it getting cold already ?
starkiller76 (8:31:39 PM): Hey
Abhi327 (8:31:44 PM): dave, i
x V DoGG x (8:31:50 PM): its ok
x V DoGG x (8:31:52 PM): yeah, cold
starkiller76 (8:31:54 PM): Yeah
x V DoGG x (8:31:55 PM): i think i have a cold
x V DoGG x (8:31:57 PM): not sure yet
Abhi327 (8:32:09 PM): i'll have my DSL set up today when i get home, and i'll email you instructions for downloading rh8.0
starkiller76 (8:32:20 PM): cool, thanx abhi
Abhi327 (8:32:31 PM): sure
Abhi327 (8:32:46 PM): how can we invite people
(8:32:46 PM) kabev1 has entered the room.
Abhi327 (8:32:54 PM): sudipta is logged in as sudigh2
x V DoGG x (8:33:09 PM): ohh
x V DoGG x (8:33:11 PM): i will get him
(8:33:44 PM) sudigh2 has entered the room.
x V DoGG x (8:33:50 PM): i might have to do it, since i started the chat
sudigh2 (8:33:54 PM): hello guys.
x V DoGG x (8:33:57 PM): hey
sudigh2 (8:34:28 PM): I'm on Linux, this is my AIM id on LInux : sudigh2
x V DoGG x (8:34:29 PM): i was just talking to issac
sudigh2 (8:35:09 PM): hi
x V DoGG x (8:35:11 PM): hmmmm
x V DoGG x (8:35:19 PM): isaac is having trouble getting the chat invitation
sudigh2 (8:35:30 PM): where are the rest ?
x V DoGG x (8:36:02 PM): anyone know how to use the "chat" functionality through an http or https proxy
x V DoGG x (8:36:03 PM): ?
x V DoGG x (8:36:26 PM): issac is at work and he is behind a proxy
x V DoGG x (8:36:33 PM): we can chat with him individually
x V DoGG x (8:36:39 PM): but he can't join the group
x V DoGG x (8:37:13 PM): maybe i can copy and paste to him
x V DoGG x (8:37:16 PM): lets get started
Abhi327 (8:37:38 PM): we are still missing someone
starkiller76 (8:37:42 PM): Kevin
Abhi327 (8:37:44 PM): yes
x V DoGG x (8:37:48 PM): ohh ok
sudigh2 (8:37:49 PM): yes kevin.
Abhi327 (8:37:58 PM): anyone know where he is ?
x V DoGG x (8:38:11 PM): nope
starkiller76 (8:38:42 PM): no idea
x V DoGG x (8:39:12 PM): how about we wait another 2 mintues
Abhi327 (8:39:15 PM): sure
sudigh2 (8:39:17 PM): what is his aim id ? maybe we can send him a chat invitation.
Abhi327 (8:39:48 PM): is issac working on joining the chat
x V DoGG x (8:40:01 PM): i don't think it is gonna work
x V DoGG x (8:40:09 PM): i will just have to copy and paste to him
Abhi327 (8:40:24 PM): hmm....
kabev1 (8:40:40 PM): illinimarske
kabev1 (8:40:53 PM): illinimarshke
x V DoGG x (8:40:53 PM): i don't see him online
x V DoGG x (8:40:55 PM): do you?
starkiller76 (8:40:56 PM): I set it to alert me when he comes online
x V DoGG x (8:41:04 PM): lets get started.....
sudigh2 (8:41:09 PM): ok.
Abhi327 (8:41:11 PM): ok lets get started
starkiller76 (8:41:15 PM): Yes
x V DoGG x (8:42:12 PM): #1
x V DoGG x (8:42:15 PM): there is an agenda up
x V DoGG x (8:42:29 PM): any volunteers
x V DoGG x (8:42:30 PM): ?
Abhi327 (8:42:44 PM): 1) Lets not talk about this right now. We could probably talk about what everyone felt reading up on the projects we researched
x V DoGG x (8:43:26 PM): ok
sudigh2 (8:43:32 PM): yes.
Abhi327 (8:43:41 PM): Homework solutions do not count much if we haven't really decided on how we wanna proceed.
x V DoGG x (8:43:41 PM): so do you mean we shouldn't discuss this at all, until later?
Abhi327 (8:43:55 PM): We can just discuss how to implement once we know where we are headed
x V DoGG x (8:44:03 PM): ok
x V DoGG x (8:44:07 PM): lets move to 1.5
x V DoGG x (8:44:28 PM): i tacked this on, so that we would have some structure to each project description that we all researched
(8:44:36 PM) illinimarshke has entered the room.
x V DoGG x (8:44:38 PM): or at least an outline to follow
illinimarshke (8:44:46 PM): sorry i'm late
x V DoGG x (8:44:53 PM): Eceguru (8:44:17 PM): i think we should try to push for a java solution based on jxtaEceguru (8:44:25 PM): there seems to be so much for itEceguru (8:44:33 PM): and it'll work on multiple platforms
sudigh2 (8:44:54 PM): no problem.
Abhi327 (8:45:04 PM): 1.5) i've posed our concern to Howard. he should replay back anytime. I'll keep the group updated on what the reply is
sudigh2 (8:46:06 PM): have you guys pushing for Java seen a p2p protocol implementation in Java yet ?
Abhi327 (8:46:26 PM): Lets start on a group basis
Abhi327 (8:46:41 PM): let everyone talk about what they think
sudigh2 (8:46:48 PM): ok.
Abhi327 (8:46:50 PM): Lets start with Vivek, kabe, and issac
Abhi327 (8:46:55 PM): Go ahead guys
x V DoGG x (8:47:31 PM): ok
x V DoGG x (8:47:52 PM): Kabe - Covered jxta
x V DoGG x (8:48:00 PM): while issac and i were looking for other options
x V DoGG x (8:48:14 PM): both issac and i had trouble finding much outside of jxta
kabev1 (8:48:17 PM): There is an existing strong develpoment community for JXTA, to build upon Isaac's earlier comments
x V DoGG x (8:48:23 PM): although there was much praise of jxta
kabev1 (8:48:26 PM): And the documentation is OUTSTANDING
x V DoGG x (8:48:42 PM): yes
x V DoGG x (8:48:45 PM): agree'd
kabev1 (8:48:58 PM): As in, multiple books writtne
x V DoGG x (8:49:01 PM): many discussions have focused on how one would merge gnutella and jxta
x V DoGG x (8:49:16 PM): but i haven't seen anything concrete on that
x V DoGG x (8:49:24 PM): Eceguru (8:49:03 PM): there are several books on it as well
x V DoGG x (8:49:47 PM): the underlying architecture seems to build off of gnutella
x V DoGG x (8:50:15 PM): and extends beyond that, to provide open interfaces for many of the commonly used technologies that are necessary to build a good p2p application
kabev1 (8:50:43 PM): In the telecommunications industry, Project JXTA technology enables the creation of ad hoc, wireless communities.
kabev1 (8:52:03 PM): plenty of examples: http://apps.jxta.org/servlets/ProjectHome
x V DoGG x (8:52:48 PM): any specific questions
x V DoGG x (8:53:26 PM): Limewire was written in java
x V DoGG x (8:53:36 PM): but i wasn't able to find out if it uses jxta, does anyone know?
x V DoGG x (8:53:44 PM): kabe or issac?
Abhi327 (8:54:12 PM): What about performance ? memory utilization ? porting to an embedded platform ? the degree of comfort that you enjoy using Java ?
starkiller76 (8:54:18 PM): no, it uses gnutella
kabev1 (8:54:36 PM): Any device capable of JSME, J2SE is capable of JXTA
sudigh2 (8:54:58 PM): also it is an open source project in progress. Any idea if any success has been achieved yet ?
starkiller76 (8:55:35 PM): the demo application works
x V DoGG x (8:55:42 PM): Eceguru (8:55:20 PM): i fell comfortable using javaEceguru (8:55:22 PM): feelx V DoGG x (8:55:26 PM): i think jxta was open source right?Eceguru (8:55:30 PM): yeah
sudigh2 (8:55:47 PM): what does the demo app do ?
starkiller76 (8:56:02 PM): basic file transfer
starkiller76 (8:56:10 PM): file search
starkiller76 (8:56:21 PM): p2p2
starkiller76 (8:56:33 PM): sorry, p2p
kabev1 (8:56:35 PM): JXTA allows for small groups of peres to join and create VPNs to other peers
sudigh2 (8:56:41 PM): what architecture does it use for simulating a p2p protocol ?
(8:56:43 PM) illinimarshke has left the room.
kabev1 (8:56:50 PM): architecture?
sudigh2 (8:56:59 PM): yes.
(8:57:18 PM) illinimarshke has entered the room.
kabev1 (8:57:19 PM): What do you mean by architecture
x V DoGG x (8:57:32 PM): jxta is an architecture as i understand
kabev1 (8:57:59 PM): true it is an architecture
x V DoGG x (8:58:00 PM): it provides api's to provide functionality within its' defined architecture
x V DoGG x (8:59:07 PM): I think there are going to be plenty of reasons to go with jxta verses gnutella, or vice versa
starkiller76 (8:59:07 PM): this document explained alot http://www.jxta.org/project/www/docs/JXT AnetworkProgEnv.pdf
x V DoGG x (8:59:26 PM): perhaps we should select one architecture verses the other based on language familiarity
x V DoGG x (8:59:52 PM): and then dig deeper in terms of open source projects (with gnutella or jxta whichever is choosen) to see where we should beging
x V DoGG x (8:59:56 PM): beging = begin
illinimarshke (8:59:59 PM): JXTA looked good from what i read
x V DoGG x (9:00:00 PM): how does that sound?
starkiller76 (9:00:28 PM): Does it make sence to use JXTA, if we are not going the use Java?
x V DoGG x (9:00:45 PM): it seems like gnutella vs. jxta is more of a implementation language choice......
x V DoGG x (9:00:55 PM): i don't think it does.... although they provide a native implementation
x V DoGG x (9:01:00 PM): for people who do not have a vm
x V DoGG x (9:01:06 PM): i don't think it would be advisible
kabev1 (9:01:34 PM): There is JXTA for C, but I am not sure how it compares
Abhi327 (9:01:42 PM): seems like you guys have done decent research and you seem to be comfortable about using Java/JXTA.
kabev1 (9:02:11 PM): There have been people in our lab who have used JXTA, so we do have some available resources
Abhi327 (9:02:37 PM): Ok realistically
Abhi327 (9:03:11 PM): we have anywhere b/w 6-7 weeks. this is to plan, and actually run iterations. We need to have something to show at the end of the semester
Abhi327 (9:03:22 PM): to the course staff
Abhi327 (9:03:36 PM): your team seems to be very familiar using JAVA
sudigh2 (9:03:38 PM): Did they use JXTA for some industry project ? or they used it for their personal use ?
Abhi327 (9:03:51 PM): i can speak of myself
Abhi327 (9:03:59 PM): i would not be comfortable using JAVA
Abhi327 (9:04:19 PM): i would be relegated to understanding the syntax rather than having fun working at a more higher level
sudigh2 (9:04:20 PM): I am not comfortable with Java either.
kabev1 (9:04:27 PM): If you know C++ at all, Java is a piece of cake, and easier for network programming
x V DoGG x (9:04:49 PM): ok
Abhi327 (9:04:49 PM): kabe, is it possible to do all of it and actually learn a new language in 6 weeks
Abhi327 (9:04:56 PM): i really think weare asking a lot
starkiller76 (9:05:09 PM): Does everyone know C++?
x V DoGG x (9:05:13 PM): perhaps it might be the same way if we went down the QT route of c++
Abhi327 (9:05:14 PM): plus we are trying to do XP here
x V DoGG x (9:05:19 PM): lets take a poll
x V DoGG x (9:05:26 PM): A = C++ & QT
x V DoGG x (9:05:29 PM): B = Java
Abhi327 (9:05:35 PM): what happens to collective ownership when part of the group doesn't even have the bearings on using the language
starkiller76 (9:06:02 PM): I think we need to talk this out a little more
starkiller76 (9:06:11 PM): this is a huge decision
Abhi327 (9:06:13 PM): A poll won't give us a solution. We need to use something that we all agree to.
x V DoGG x (9:06:24 PM): abhi - is it true we need to have something "working" to show at the end of this semester
Abhi327 (9:06:27 PM): Afterall all of us have to work on this project
x V DoGG x (9:06:32 PM): i must have missed that somewhere along the lines
illinimarshke (9:06:44 PM): overall, java is alot easier to work with
Abhi327 (9:06:54 PM): and we need to have a way to make everyone work to the best of their ability with minimum learning curve
sudigh2 (9:07:02 PM): networking apps on java is pretty new.
x V DoGG x (9:07:09 PM): i wanted to take a poll to check who is capable of programming in what language, not just a preference
starkiller76 (9:07:20 PM): I agree
Abhi327 (9:07:26 PM): sure vivek
x V DoGG x (9:07:29 PM): so the poll may answer our questions without having to talk for ever
Abhi327 (9:07:38 PM): i just want to make sure we all are on the same page
Abhi327 (9:08:00 PM): since in the end we'll all be accountable for the work we do on the project.
x V DoGG x (9:08:04 PM): Eceguru (9:06:18 PM): BEceguru (9:06:43 PM): i think some of us will have to learn a new language/interface no matter the decision
x V DoGG x (9:08:30 PM): A & B
Abhi327 (9:08:38 PM): i don't want it to be a case where most of the load is on a few individuals because the rewt are trying to understand how to use a language
sudigh2 (9:08:45 PM): i think all of us have to learn p2p architecture .
x V DoGG x (9:08:52 PM): agreed, but i agree with issac
x V DoGG x (9:09:00 PM): i am sure someone will sacarfice
Abhi327 (9:09:06 PM): i agree with issac completely
x V DoGG x (9:09:10 PM): but we should make sure it is the minority who is sacraficing
x V DoGG x (9:09:19 PM): hence the reason for the poll
x V DoGG x (9:09:24 PM): Eceguru (9:09:15 PM): i can program in either environments
Abhi327 (9:09:28 PM): we all have to learn something new
sudigh2 (9:09:32 PM): all of us are in the same boat with regards the technology we hve to learn.
illinimarshke (9:09:34 PM): lets just decide
x V DoGG x (9:10:08 PM): technology yes, language no
illinimarshke (9:10:08 PM): either way ppl are going to have to learn new stuff
Abhi327 (9:10:33 PM): i agree kevin. however, how much we can learn and be productive is the question
illinimarshke (9:10:39 PM): this is our 2nd meeting where we have not accomplished much
starkiller76 (9:10:41 PM): Does everyone know C++? or have at least used it?
Abhi327 (9:10:45 PM): whatever we decide, we all have to learnsomething new
sudigh2 (9:10:48 PM): so lets all learn the technology which is the core, rather than a new language.
illinimarshke (9:10:48 PM): we just need to move on already
Abhi327 (9:11:10 PM): ok
illinimarshke (9:11:22 PM): c++/linux/qt is a little more difficult than java
x V DoGG x (9:11:29 PM): Can we take the freakin' pole....
illinimarshke (9:11:30 PM): plus then we can code on any os
x V DoGG x (9:11:37 PM): i think it will answer the question simply
illinimarshke (9:11:40 PM): rather then having to telnet in
x V DoGG x (9:12:01 PM): A = qt/linux/c++ can be done comfortably
x V DoGG x (9:12:10 PM): B = java comfortably
x V DoGG x (9:12:18 PM): you can pick A, B, or A & B
illinimarshke (9:12:26 PM): B
x V DoGG x (9:12:27 PM): then we know what skills our team lacks
starkiller76 (9:12:37 PM): A & B
x V DoGG x (9:12:38 PM): A & B
sudigh2 (9:12:50 PM): A
Abhi327 (9:13:04 PM): A - C/C++ with any UI toolkit
kabev1 (9:13:12 PM): A & B
x V DoGG x (9:13:30 PM): ok so java seems to be in the minority
x V DoGG x (9:13:59 PM): Eceguru (9:13:52 PM): A&B
x V DoGG x (9:14:11 PM): Now lets take a poll to see
x V DoGG x (9:14:18 PM): what everyone would prefer
starkiller76 (9:14:27 PM): B
x V DoGG x (9:14:33 PM): B
sudigh2 (9:14:37 PM): A
illinimarshke (9:14:41 PM): B
Abhi327 (9:14:43 PM): A
kabev1 (9:14:48 PM): B
x V DoGG x (9:14:59 PM): hmmmmm
Abhi327 (9:15:02 PM): :-)
x V DoGG x (9:15:05 PM): Eceguru (9:15:01 PM): B
sudigh2 (9:15:14 PM): any idea whats going on with Guru ?
x V DoGG x (9:15:26 PM): ok so the difference between people who know C++ vs. Java seems to be trivial
starkiller76 (9:15:30 PM): haven't heard from him
x V DoGG x (9:15:32 PM): 1 vs. 2
x V DoGG x (9:15:41 PM): i would say it is easier to pickup java then to pickup c++
Abhi327 (9:15:50 PM): nope i've sent an email to howard letting him know of it
x V DoGG x (9:15:51 PM): would other java programmers agree?
sudigh2 (9:15:51 PM): abhishek did you mail Howard about Guru ?
illinimarshke (9:15:59 PM): guru just responded to my e-mail from a week ago
kabev1 (9:16:00 PM): I agree
illinimarshke (9:16:51 PM): ok so java it is?
x V DoGG x (9:16:53 PM): java seems to be popular 5 vs 2
sudigh2 (9:16:59 PM): are all of you well conversant with c ?
starkiller76 (9:17:11 PM): yes
kabev1 (9:17:17 PM): yup
Abhi327 (9:17:19 PM): yup
x V DoGG x (9:17:21 PM): yep
illinimarshke (9:17:27 PM): yeah
sudigh2 (9:17:30 PM): then why have we left out c as our choice ?
kabev1 (9:17:50 PM): I think we would have the same outcome
x V DoGG x (9:18:16 PM): lets re-run the preference poll, just for kicks
x V DoGG x (9:18:24 PM): A = qt/c++/linux
x V DoGG x (9:18:28 PM): B = java
x V DoGG x (9:18:32 PM): C = c
kabev1 (9:18:35 PM): B
x V DoGG x (9:18:37 PM): B
starkiller76 (9:18:39 PM): B
illinimarshke (9:18:42 PM): we need to timebox stuff next time
sudigh2 (9:18:44 PM): A/C
illinimarshke (9:18:55 PM): B
x V DoGG x (9:19:04 PM): Eceguru (9:18:41 PM): java looks like c++ mostlyEceguru (9:18:50 PM): shouldn't be a huge problem to overcome
Abhi327 (9:19:14 PM): A/C --- This isn't going anywhere ......Lets decide now
x V DoGG x (9:19:21 PM): i agree... i will do that
Abhi327 (9:19:40 PM): Ok everyone, it seems like Java is the preferred choice
x V DoGG x (9:19:46 PM): abhi & Sudigh it looks like java overwelhmingly.....
Abhi327 (9:19:48 PM): the rest of the team members must learn
x V DoGG x (9:19:55 PM): ok
x V DoGG x (9:20:08 PM): any one want to speak, or forever hold your peach
illinimarshke (9:20:10 PM): at about vb?
x V DoGG x (9:20:16 PM): peach = peace
Abhi327 (9:20:25 PM): ok team
Abhi327 (9:20:28 PM): one concern
x V DoGG x (9:20:29 PM): #3
x V DoGG x (9:20:35 PM): ok
x V DoGG x (9:20:37 PM): back up
Abhi327 (9:21:08 PM): now we definitely need to have pair programming especially pair people up so that we have a JAVA guru and a novice. This shoule speed up things.
x V DoGG x (9:21:30 PM): point well taken
x V DoGG x (9:21:45 PM): kevin - i didn't follow your vb comment
x V DoGG x (9:21:50 PM): was that addressing this point?
x V DoGG x (9:21:55 PM): are you suggesting vb?
x V DoGG x (9:22:19 PM): if so, i don't think anyone looked at it, did anyone? thus its probably not a good time to start looking now...
x V DoGG x (9:22:47 PM): kevin
kabev1 (9:22:55 PM): Guys, I have got to go in 5 minutes
x V DoGG x (9:23:03 PM): can you send out the link to the jxta based file sharing client
illinimarshke (9:23:18 PM): sorry, i was joking
sudigh2 (9:23:51 PM): can we proceed to the next now ?
x V DoGG x (9:24:08 PM): yes
x V DoGG x (9:24:13 PM): the next item is
x V DoGG x (9:24:15 PM): #3
x V DoGG x (9:24:21 PM): that is what i was referring too
x V DoGG x (9:24:29 PM): we need to have a project that we can spring board off of
illinimarshke (9:24:38 PM): here is a good article: http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/ wireless/library/wi-fshare/?loc=dwmain
sudigh2 (9:24:41 PM): we are building on top of jxta I guess.
x V DoGG x (9:24:54 PM): jxta is an architecture
x V DoGG x (9:24:58 PM): not an application
x V DoGG x (9:25:09 PM): thus we can use jxta api's to build an application
x V DoGG x (9:25:23 PM): but i was hoping for a simple example that we may have run across
sudigh2 (9:26:14 PM): that is what it means, we can basically use jxta as our underlying architecture.
x V DoGG x (9:26:59 PM): ok
sudigh2 (9:27:04 PM): anybody any comments ?
x V DoGG x (9:27:07 PM): but i thought that #3
x V DoGG x (9:27:21 PM): was supposed to address an application that we can build upon, not just an architecture
Abhi327 (9:27:48 PM): why don't the JAVA team propose what we should be doing. build on top of an existing client application ? what technology ? examples group can look at ?
sudigh2 (9:28:06 PM): we can look into qtella and try to do something similar.
x V DoGG x (9:28:39 PM): perhaps we should break off at this point since not everyone is familiar with jxta
x V DoGG x (9:28:45 PM): and send out some information for everyone to read
x V DoGG x (9:28:51 PM): and then meet back at the middle of the week?
x V DoGG x (9:28:55 PM): how does that sound
x V DoGG x (9:28:56 PM): ?
sudigh2 (9:28:56 PM): but first we need to understand the architecture well, else we cannot develop anything on top of it.
Abhi327 (9:28:59 PM): We need an app we would like to model and refernec from time to time.
x V DoGG x (9:29:09 PM): ahbi - yes i agree
Abhi327 (9:29:15 PM): ok cool
Abhi327 (9:29:19 PM): lets do that
x V DoGG x (9:29:24 PM): everyone else?
Abhi327 (9:29:25 PM): we can plan to meet again on thursday
sudigh2 (9:29:57 PM): does anyone know of a jxta application ?
x V DoGG x (9:30:08 PM): yes, kabe sent out a link earlier
sudigh2 (9:30:11 PM): I guess marshall was talking something along those lines.
illinimarshke (9:30:17 PM): http://demos.jxta.org/servlets/ProjectHome
sudigh2 (9:30:22 PM): ok.
kabev1 (9:30:31 PM): alright guys, I goota run
kabev1 (9:30:44 PM): Vivek, let me know of anything new
sudigh2 (9:30:54 PM): lets finish off soon.
x V DoGG x (9:30:58 PM): does thursday work for everyone?
x V DoGG x (9:31:03 PM): Eceguru (9:30:50 PM): thurs. meeting sounds goodEceguru (9:30:52 PM): same time?
x V DoGG x (9:31:06 PM): same time?
Abhi327 (9:31:09 PM): same time is good
kabev1 (9:31:10 PM): fine w/ me
Abhi327 (9:31:24 PM): Thursday 8:30 C.S.T
sudigh2 (9:31:29 PM): fine with me.
starkiller76 (9:31:31 PM): http://www.jxta.org/
x V DoGG x (9:31:38 PM): ok
x V DoGG x (9:31:40 PM): all set
starkiller76 (9:31:42 PM): this website has tons of info and examples
sudigh2 (9:32:10 PM): who is gonna put things on wiki this time ?
Abhi327 (9:32:14 PM): thursday we must plan to decide on
starkiller76 (9:32:21 PM): I can't meet on thursday, I have an annual meeting for work
Abhi327 (9:32:31 PM): what app. we wanna model, technology ......etc.
sudigh2 (9:32:38 PM): yes.
(9:32:41 PM) kabev1 has left the room.
starkiller76 (9:32:47 PM): Can we do Wed. or Friday instead
sudigh2 (9:32:56 PM): also we should be in a position to start off with modules for each pair.
x V DoGG x (9:33:16 PM): friday works for me
Abhi327 (9:33:29 PM): Lets not rush in to modules. Sudipta, it'll only get clearer after our next meeting.
Abhi327 (9:33:49 PM): I would like friday evening off
Abhi327 (9:33:51 PM): any other day
Abhi327 (9:33:52 PM): is fine
illinimarshke (9:34:01 PM): i can meet thurs either since i will be in a plane
x V DoGG x (9:34:05 PM): Abhi327 (9:33:29 PM): Lets not rush in to modules. Sudipta, it'll only get clearer after our next meeting. Eceguru (9:33:47 PM): i have to get going nowEceguru (9:33:59 PM): friday is good for me
Abhi327 (9:34:38 PM): team wednesday ? or saturday ?
sudigh2 (9:34:44 PM): wed
x V DoGG x (9:34:45 PM): x V DoGG x (9:34:21 PM): wed?Eceguru (9:34:26 PM): i prefer friday
starkiller76 (9:34:52 PM): Wed fine
x V DoGG x (9:35:07 PM): wed can work (possibly)
Abhi327 (9:35:17 PM): how about issac and kevin ?
Abhi327 (9:35:31 PM): sudipta ?
illinimarshke (9:35:35 PM): wed-fri is bad for snce i travel alot
x V DoGG x (9:35:45 PM): kabe says maybe wed.
sudigh2 (9:35:50 PM): yes Abhishek
Abhi327 (9:35:51 PM): how about saturday ?
sudigh2 (9:36:00 PM): what time ?
x V DoGG x (9:36:05 PM): Eceguru (9:35:35 PM): whateverEceguru (9:35:48 PM): figured friday would give us more time to look ovcer things
sudigh2 (9:36:11 PM): 9.30 am PST Sat ?
x V DoGG x (9:36:36 PM): so that is 11:30 central?
sudigh2 (9:36:43 PM): but Sat is too late, we need to get started if we wanna give something at the end of semester.
x V DoGG x (9:36:50 PM): i agree
x V DoGG x (9:36:56 PM): that only gives us one day between meetings
starkiller76 (9:37:17 PM): can anybody absolutely not do wed?
illinimarshke (9:37:31 PM): i cannot
Abhi327 (9:37:40 PM): Guys anyday any time except friday evening is fine by me
x V DoGG x (9:37:48 PM): kevin - what day can you do?
x V DoGG x (9:37:54 PM): wed - friday?
illinimarshke (9:38:01 PM): mon-tues-sat-sun
x V DoGG x (9:38:07 PM): ok, well....
x V DoGG x (9:38:15 PM): if the team agress we need to meet before sat
x V DoGG x (9:38:24 PM): then kevin's schedule can't be accomodated
x V DoGG x (9:38:38 PM): does everyone agree we should get started before saturday?
sudigh2 (9:38:42 PM): hey, one thing.
Abhi327 (9:39:05 PM): most people will probably put in decent time on saturday than on a weekday
sudigh2 (9:39:09 PM): java on Linux will be a pain, I had prev experiences with it.
x V DoGG x (9:39:19 PM): i just linux all the time
sudigh2 (9:39:26 PM): can we develop on Solaris ?
Abhi327 (9:39:39 PM): where do you solaris from
x V DoGG x (9:39:45 PM): its java... it shouldn't matter, unless you are doing native jni calls
sudigh2 (9:39:49 PM): from the univ CSIL m/cs ?
x V DoGG x (9:39:54 PM): which should not be necessary in this project
Abhi327 (9:40:32 PM): how about everyone just send an email to vivek letting him know of a time convenient to them. Vivek would you then pick a time convenient to most of us. Or i can do it as well. fine by me.
x V DoGG x (9:40:45 PM): ok.... as of right now
x V DoGG x (9:40:52 PM): i can take care of it
x V DoGG x (9:41:02 PM): it is wed @ 8:30....
x V DoGG x (9:41:12 PM): it may change if i get alot of email :-)
x V DoGG x (9:41:16 PM): requesting otherwise
sudigh2 (9:41:19 PM): ok.
x V DoGG x (9:41:23 PM): i will send an email if it does
x V DoGG x (9:41:33 PM): see ya later
Abhi327 (9:41:35 PM): ok great
starkiller76 (9:41:36 PM): Fine
x V DoGG x (9:41:37 PM): i will take care of summarizing
x V DoGG x (9:41:43 PM): lets adjornm
sudigh2 (9:41:45 PM): ok bye.
x V DoGG x (9:41:49 PM): typo my bad
Abhi327 (9:41:54 PM): ok
Abhi327 (9:41:56 PM): thanks vivek
starkiller76 (9:42:10 PM): bye everyone
Abhi327 (9:42:11 PM): goodnight everyone !!
(9:42:17 PM) starkiller76 has left the room.
(9:42:25 PM) Abhi327 has left the room.
sudigh2 (9:42:25 PM): good night.
(9:42:47 PM) sudigh2 has left the room.
(9:43:14 PM) illinimarshke has left the room.